How does Major Change Affect Employment?

Most Modern Awards contain a requirement for employers to consult with employees that they have “made a definite decision to introduce major changes in production, program, organisation, structure or technology that are likely to have significant effects on employees”.

But what is a ‘major change’? In Port Kembla Coal Terminal Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FCAFC 99, the Full Court of the Federal Court provided some useful commentary on the meaning of the phrase.

Jessup J’s Approach

Jessup J said that the fact that an employee or a group of employees were being made redundant did not of itself constitute a major change. In order to determine whether a major change was taking place, Jessup J said that the court had to consider the “size and importance” of the change “with which those redundancies were associated”.

His Honour found that the change initiated by Port Kembla Coal Terminal Ltd which resulted in Mr was not a major change, as it only involved the termination of 3 out of 98 employees and had a minimal effect on the duties of the remaining employees.

White J’s definition of ‘Major Change’

White J agreed with Jessup J, adopted a similar interpretation of the term ‘major change’. His Honour explained that “a simple comparison” between the number of employees made redundant and the number of employees in the workforce overall will not determine conclusively whether or not a change is major. His Honour did suggest that a change that involves making employees redundant may be major if the employees who are being made redundant occupy senior and important employees, and the redundancies will have substantial consequences for the continuing employees.

Rangiah J’s definition of ‘Major Change’

Rangiah J adopted a reasonably broad definition of the phrase ‘major change’, suggesting that it refers to a major change in the manner in which work is done, managed, arranged or otherwise organised in the employer’s enterprise.

Contrary Jessup and White JJ, Rangiah J held that the change instituted by Port Kembla Coal Terminal Ltd was a major change. His Honour found that the operational review conducted by Port Kembla Coal Terminal Ltd involved a commitment to make use of voluntary redundancies to reduce the number of stand-alone positions in the medium term. This of itself constituted a major change that was likely to have a significant effect on employees in the future. It did not matter that the impact was not immediate or direct.

Lessons for Employers

Employers need not be worried that every single round of redundancies will constitute a ‘major change’ that engages the consultation provisions in the Modern Award that applies to their employees.

Rather, when considering whether they are required to consult with their employees, employers should focus on the organisational and operational changes that underpin any such redundancies. They should consider:

  • The size and importance of the changes for the employee’s business.
  • How many employees those operational and organisational changes are likely to effect.
  • How senior the affected employees are likely to be.
  • How significant the effect on them is likely to be.

They should not only consider direct and immediate impacts, but should also take into account effects of the change that might not materialise until some time in the future. They should also keep in mind that changes can affect different employees in different ways. For example, the termination of one employee could lead to a significant increase in the workload of another employee.

Most employers realise that employee consultation and communication is a key component of the planning of all significant organisational and operational changes. Needless uncertainty and stress in the workplace is not conducive to strong employee performance and productivity. In this respect, good employers will err on the side of consulting their employees.

How can JFM Law Help?

Contact JFM Law on (02) 9199 8597 for a no obligation chat. If you would rather get in contact through email, send your question through or by email at wehelp@jfmlaw.com.au

 

The information contained in this post is current at the date of editing – 27 November 2023.

How Individual Flexibility Arrangements Can Benefit Your Business

How Individual Flexibility Arrangements Can Benefit Your Business

In today’s fast-evolving business landscape, ‘flexibility’ is a necessity. Employers are constantly seeking ways to balance operational demands with employee needs while staying compliant with workplace laws. One effective tool for achieving this balance is the Individual Flexibility Arrangement (IFA). 

read more
A Cautionary Tale About Incorporating Workplace Policies and Procedures into Employment Contracts

A Cautionary Tale About Incorporating Workplace Policies and Procedures into Employment Contracts

Do you know if your workplace procedures and policies form part of your employment agreements with your staff?  You might want to check… 

The High Court’s recent decision in Elisha v Vision Australia (Elisha) has significant implications for employers who incorporate workplace procedures and policies into employment contracts.  Mr Elisha, an employee of Vision Australia, was dismissed following an investigation into alleged misconduct. The investigation process failed to adhere to the company’s own disciplinary procedure, which was incorporated into Mr Elisha’s employment contract. 

read more
Navigating Christmas Shutdowns: An Employer’s Guide to Annual Leave

Navigating Christmas Shutdowns: An Employer’s Guide to Annual Leave

The festive season brings joy, family time, and… the yearly headache of managing the Christmas shutdown.  One of the biggest challenges is annual leave.  The rules have changed in recent years, and these changes have shifted the power dynamic regarding shutdown leave; importantly, employers can no longer require employees to take unpaid leave over the Christmas shutdown. 

read more